🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (and the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is placed number four in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive power on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, though, Fritz is often overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much energy to win it. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than almost anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {