🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid first step," said one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and fit for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional government level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating parental consent for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain figures to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.